Dave Youl

I think I’ve discovered why I’ve an inherent dislike of using ‘Web 2.0′ terminology to describe the interactive nature of the web as it exists right now.

I was reading through a great article in the latest (August 2008) PC User magazine, when it finally dawned on me. I think that due to the continually changing nature of how the web is growing and changing, to label it anything at all, is contrary to its very nature. The article itself points towards the future of the internet, attempting to discuss ‘Web 3.0′ and even up to ‘Web 10.0′ (or ‘n.0). I think my problem (and it may or may not be just MY problem) is that as soon as you label or ‘pigeon hole’ what’s happening on the web, and how people are using it, that label will almost be superseded as quickly as it is given.

Having said that – I don’t know what the answer is. I understand the desire for people to distinguish between the original static nature of the web, and the dynamic, interactive ‘beast’ it has become. But I really wonder if we’re doing ourselves a disservice by trying to dissect one from the other?

Are we better therefore, to discuss and acknowledge the constant state of flux that is ‘the web’, rather than try to label something that never remains the same?